CNA-VGAP-047: Test strength is never measured automatically: no coverage build, no scheduled fuzzing campaign, and the Direct2D mutation checker only dry-runs

CNA snapshot 009d40f5  ·  Known Issues › Verification gaps  ·  source links pinned to 009d40f5

✓

Evidence basis: source-verified at the pinned commit; tests exist (not executed for this page). Claims on this page were checked by reading the CNA source at commit 009d40f5; unless a sentence says otherwise, nothing here was built or executed. Nothing on this page was executed unless the Evidence section says so.

No workflow or CMake option enables coverage instrumentation, the libFuzzer-capable harnesses are not CTests and no job or schedule runs them (their large recorded campaigns were manual, one-time runs), and direct2d_mutation_check.py runs only as --dry-run in a manual workflow.

Identifier
CNA-VGAP-047
Category
Verification gap
Subsystem
Testing & evidence
Status
Open
Verified against
CNA 009d40f5 (009d40f5dd085c4e674d3479675fac84b12b3e0a)
Evidence basis
Source-verified: read at TARGET, not executed
Tests touching this area
Yes: see Current tests
Affected contract
CNA's test-strength instruments: coverage, fuzzing, mutation checking

Expected behaviour

Instruments that CNA has built to measure its tests are run often enough to produce current numbers.

Actual behaviour at TARGET

No workflow and no file under cmake/ adds --coverage or configures gcov, lcov, gcovr or llvm-cov; cnaext-coverage.md records one --coverage build of 2026-08-18, for the graphics-ext layer only. Harnesses.cmake builds cna_compiled_effect_fuzzer, cna_xna_model_fuzzer and cna_xna_intermediate_fuzzer and states they are not registered as CTests; the C ABI fuzz sources are an object library only (CMakeLists.txt). CNA did run these harnesses by hand and records the results (plan_fx.md FX-051: about 3.08 million and 2.67 million coverage-guided executions with 41 crash classes fixed; plan_xnapipeline_parity.md XNAPP-290: a 1.16 million-document sanitizer run over the .x and FBX readers), but nothing repeats them, so those numbers age. In CI only deterministic fuzz-named GoogleTests run. d3d-windows-ci.yml (manual) runs direct2d_mutation_check.py with --dry-run, which checks only that each mutation's anchor still applies; the --run mode that rebuilds and requires the targeted test to fail is never automated.

Source locations

Evidence

Checked by reading at 009d40f5; not executed.

Independent re-verification: Checked by reading at 009d40f5; not executed. The regression test should be a scheduled coverage job, a scheduled short fuzzing run per harness from its committed corpus, and a scheduled --run of the mutation checker.

Focused reproduction

No focused reproduction is known. Nothing has been invented here; the evidence above is what exists.

Current tests

Deterministic fuzz-named GoogleTests (for example the XNB container and LZX decoder fuzz tests).

Regression test

A scheduled coverage job, a scheduled short fuzzing campaign per harness with a corpus, and a scheduled --run of the mutation checker.

Blast radius

Confidence in test adequacy; no functional path is affected.

Workaround

No workaround is known.

The same subject is explained at several altitudes. These are the neighbouring pages at each one.